Bonobos vs Polo Ralph Lauren: which short wins?
Both land in the premium tier — the Bonobos Stretch Washed Chino Short at $89, the Polo Ralph Lauren Stretch Classic Fit Prepster Short at $89. Here's how they stack up, head to head.
| Bonobos | Polo Ralph Lauren | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $89 | $89 |
| Material | Soft washed stretch cotton twill, 92% cotton / 8% spandex, mid-weight with a non-iron finish. | Mid-weight washed cotton twill with a touch of elastane for give; soft and pre-broken-in rather than crisp. |
| Fit | Slim or standard cut with the signature curved waistband, true to size; choose among 5", 7", 9" and 11" inseams — the 9" is the safe default. | Classic fit with a pull-on elastic-drawstring waist and a 6-inch inseam — relaxed through the seat and thigh. Sizing runs small and is a bit inconsistent, so most guys size up. |
| Quality | Solid premium — soft, comfortable and cleanly built, but the washed cloth is casual not crisp and the hem and back-pocket stitching wear first after repeated hot washes. | Solidly made — sturdy washed twill, a clean zip fly and an adjustable drawstring waist — but the dye fades unevenly with hot washing and the pony embroidery frays first if you dry it hot. |
| Best for | Smart-casual summer wear and anyone who fights waistband gap or seat sag in shorts and wants to pick their exact inseam. | Classic preppy and smart-casual wear for guys who want the recognizable Polo look and an easy, drawstring-comfortable cut over a slim structured one. |
| Care | Cold wash and tumble low or hang; the washed twill is non-iron, stays soft and resists wrinkling, and cold washing slows fading at the seams. | Machine wash cold and hang or tumble low to protect the dye and the embroidered pony; hot wash and high heat are what dull the color and pucker the logo. |
At identical $89 list prices, these two shorts use comparable mid-weight washed cotton-spandex twill and share the same first failure points — seam fading and embellishment fraying under heat. The real difference is structural: one is built around a precision fit system, the other around brand identity and a relaxed pull-on cut. There is no price gap to justify; the question is purely what the $89 is buying in each case.
- The case for Bonobos
- Bonobos wins on fit engineering — four inseam lengths, a curved waistband that measurably reduces gap and sag, and a slim-or-standard cut choice give buyers structural control that generic chino shorts do not offer.
- The case for Polo Ralph Lauren
- Polo Ralph Lauren wins on ease and relaxed comfort — the elastic drawstring waist needs no precise sizing, the classic fit is forgiving through the seat and thigh, and the recognizable prep aesthetic is part of what owners are paying for.
The bottom lineWhich should you buy?
Buy the Polo if the relaxed fit, pull-on convenience, and Polo branding are the point — but wait for the frequent sales where it drops under $50, because on construction alone the specs support a $55-60 price and the remainder is logo equity. Buy the Bonobos if waistband gap, seat sag, or inseam length have been recurring frustrations with off-the-rack shorts, because the fit system is the tangible thing the $89 is buying and it is not replicated at lower price points; at full price that specific engineering is a reasonable trade, and at a discount it is an easy one.
We may earn a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you.