Ted Baker vs Uniqlo: is the pricier polo worth it?
The Uniqlo AIRism Cotton Pique Polo Shirt runs $30; the Ted Baker Zeiter Slim Fit Pure Cotton Polo is $69 — about 2.3× the price ($39 more). Here's the side-by-side, and what that gap actually buys.
| Uniqlo | Ted Baker | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $30 | $69 |
| Material | A pique knit that Uniqlo lists as 57% cotton and 43% nylon in the body, with a 73% polyester, 27% rayon rib collar; the nylon side is what gives it the quick-drying behavior. | 100% cotton in a soft-touch interlock knit, giving a smoother, dressier surface than standard pique. |
| Fit | Regular fit with a straight silhouette, and Uniqlo's own fit ratings from 282 reviewers land close to true to size. Multiple recent owners report the shirt shrinking after a wash, so cautious buyers can size up or commit to cold washing and hang drying. | Ted Baker's slim fit is effectively extra slim — fitted close to the body all over — and the Zeiter runs small, with retailer guidance to order one size up. A regular-fit version of the Zeiter has also been sold through third-party retailers. |
| Quality | Independent testing called it well constructed for the price, with even stitching throughout; the recurring durability complaint in owner reviews is post-wash shrinkage rather than seam or fabric failure. | Finishing is a step above basic polos, with a webbing-trimmed placket, split hem and branded buttons. The smooth interlock is a dressier, lighter-duty knit than a rugged sports pique, so treat it as a smart-casual piece rather than a knockabout one. |
| Best for | A wicking, easy-care polo for hot-weather and business-casual wear under $35, for wearers who value performance fabric over an all-natural knit. | Slimmer builds who want a close-fitting, polished polo for smart-casual wear rather than an athletic-cut sports pique. |
| Care | Uniqlo's care tag reads machine wash cold, do not dry clean; given repeated owner shrinkage reports, skip the dryer and hang dry. | Machine wash cold (30°C) and dry flat to hold the slim shape; the brand says it may also be dry cleaned. |
The $39.10 gap between these two polos buys a different fabric philosophy — the Uniqlo is a synthetic-cotton blend engineered for moisture management and easy care, while the Ted Baker is a 100% cotton interlock cut close to the body with dressier finishing details. Both have been validated as fair value at their respective price points, but neither is trading solely on brand name. The question is whether the step up in fabric purity and tailored presentation is worth 2.3× the outlay.
- The case for Uniqlo
- The Uniqlo wins on practicality: its nylon-blend pique wicks moisture, dries quickly, and was independently ranked best value in a multi-polo test, all for under $35.
- The case for Ted Baker
- The Ted Baker wins on presentation: 100% cotton interlock has a smoother, dressier surface than pique, and the webbing-trimmed placket, split hem, and branded buttons deliver finishing details absent at the Uniqlo's price point.
The bottom lineIs the pricier one worth it?
Buy the Uniqlo if the polo will see heat, sweat, or frequent washing — the performance fabric and sub-$30 price make shrinkage management (cold wash, hang dry) a reasonable trade-off, and the construction holds up well. Step up to the Ted Baker only if the wearer has a slimmer build, genuinely needs a close-fitting silhouette for smart-casual occasions, and is buying it at the commonly discounted ~$69 rather than the $120 list price — at that marked-down figure the all-cotton interlock and finishing details represent real material and construction upgrades. The $39 gap is not primarily buying brand prestige at the sale price, but it is buying a lighter-duty garment that rewards careful handling over workhorse versatility.
We may earn a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you.