Lacoste vs Polo Ralph Lauren: which polo wins?
Both land in the premium tier — the Lacoste L.12.12 Polo at $110, the Polo Ralph Lauren The Iconic Mesh Polo Shirt at $118, just $8 apart. Here's how they stack up, head to head.
| Lacoste | Polo Ralph Lauren | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $110 | $118 |
| Material | A 100% cotton pique knit — the fine "petit pique" texture the line is known for — that runs thinner and lighter than most pique polos. | Breathable cotton mesh in a pique-style knit — textured, with a little give — with an embroidered logo; the brand does not publish a fabric weight. |
| Fit | The classic fit is roomy through the body, but the shirt runs small and short overall by American sizing. Owners who machine-dry recommend ordering a size up. | The classic fit is roomy through the body and long in the hem, and owner sizing reports conflict: some call it accurate, others size up or choose the custom slim fit for a closer cut. Tall, slim wearers most often find the classic cut baggy. |
| Quality | Construction is solid for the tier — dense knit collar, tidy stitching — but several long-time owners report that recent production pills and stretches more readily than the shirts they bought years ago. | Owners report the shirt holding its shape and color through repeated washing and cleaning, though some longtime buyers say current fabric feels thinner than older shirts and that the ribbed collar can curl with all-day wear. |
| Best for | Someone who wants the original pique polo in its trim, shorter cut and is comfortable paying a brand premium, or patient enough to buy on markdown. | Someone who wants the reference version of the American cotton polo in a wide color range and multiple fits, and accepts that part of the price buys the logo. |
| Care | Wash cold and air dry: owners consistently report roughly a full size of shrinkage from a hot dryer. | Machine wash cold and skip high heat when drying to keep the collar flat and the colors from fading. |
At $110 and $118 respectively, these two shirts are priced within $8 of each other at the top of the premium pique-polo tier — a gap so small it is functionally irrelevant. Both carry acknowledged brand premiums that reviewers say are not fully justified by fabric or construction alone, and both suffer from reported quality drift in recent production runs. The real difference is in fit architecture, color range, and which logo the buyer is paying to wear.
- The case for Lacoste
- The Lacoste wins on a tighter, shorter, more structured cut with a denser knit collar and a more distinct pique texture — the closer thing to a tailored silhouette between the two, if the buyer sizes up to account for shrinkage.
- The case for Polo Ralph Lauren
- The Ralph Lauren wins on fit versatility — multiple cut options including a custom slim fit — a longer hem that reads more proportionate on taller frames, and owner-reported color and shape retention through repeated washing.
The bottom lineWhich should you buy?
Buy the Lacoste if the priority is a trim, structured polo with a recognizable pique texture and the buyer is willing to manage sizing carefully, air-dry religiously, and ideally wait for the 40–50% markdowns that make it a genuinely defensible mid-tier purchase. Buy the Ralph Lauren if the priority is a relaxed, longer-cut shirt in a wide color range that holds up through regular machine washing without special handling, or if a slim-fit option matters — and similarly, the $99 sale price is when it earns its place. The $8 gap buys nothing measurable in fabric or construction; both shirts are above-average cotton polos priced partly on heritage and logo, and neither justifies full retail over the other.
We may earn a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you.