Abercrombie & Fitch vs Puma: which sweatpant wins?
Both land in the mid tier — the Abercrombie & Fitch Essential Sunday Jogger at $50, the Puma Essentials Fleece Sweatpant at $50. Here's how they stack up, head to head.
| Abercrombie & Fitch | Puma | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $50 | $50 |
| Material | Cotton-blend fleece, ~10oz, brushed interior. | Cotton/polyester fleece, ~9oz, brushed interior. |
| Fit | Clean tapered fit, true to size; slightly trim through the leg. | Tapered athletic fit, true to size. |
| Quality | Solid mid-tier — heavier fleece, tidy construction, holds shape across washes. | Solid mid-tier — dependable mid-weight fleece, recognisable branding. |
| Best for | Elevated everyday loungewear, clean tapered looks, and promotion shoppers. | Recognisable athletic loungewear, gym-to-street wear, and value shoppers. |
| Care | Wash cold and tumble low to preserve the fleece and the clean cut. | Wash cold inside-out and tumble low to protect the logo and fleece. |
Both are $50 mid-tier joggers, and the difference is fleece weight and styling. Abercrombie's Sunday Jogger runs ~10oz with a clean, slightly trim taper; Puma's Essentials is lighter at ~9oz and trades on its recognizable athletic branding.
Heavier ~10oz fleece, clean tapered cut, holds shape across washes, tidier construction
Recognizable athletic branding, gym-to-street look, lighter mid-weight feel, frequent promotions
Which should you buy?
Same $50, no price gap to weigh. Go Abercrombie if you want the heavier fleece and the cleaner, more put-together cut for everyday wear. Pick the Puma if you want the recognizable athletic look and a lighter pant for the gym, and you can usually catch it on promotion. The Abercrombie is the better-built pick; the Puma is the more sport-branded one.
We may earn a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you.